Breaking: Sebelius Approved – Updated**

ChelseaPolitics, video2 Comments

I just saw this seconds ago on CNN – haven’t found a news story online yet: by a vote of 63-31 in the Senate, Kathleen Sebelius has officially been approved. Folks, meet your new Health and Human Services Secretary – unapologetic defender of sucking the brains out of partially delivered babies and covering-up rapes:

**Update: found it online: Sebelius Wins Senate Confirmation as Health Secretary Nominee – got the numbers wrong up there. The vote was 65 (not 63) to 31.

**Update: Just heard that, yes, Brownback did vote for her confirmation.

Choice and Disability

ChelseaDisabled, Embryo Screening1 Comment

As a disabled person myself I can totally relate to much of what is said in this article from The F-Word: Contemporary UK Feminism:

Who has the privilege of deciding what constitutes a “serious handicap”? Not disabled people, that’s for sure. It’s no wonder that our voices are excluded from the abortion debate when the right to define disability is accorded only to professionals and the people who have to ‘cope’ with us. In some quarters, the severity of a handicap is determined by the financial and emotional cost of the disabled person’s treatment and care…

Despite these efforts to cut disabled people off from the debate, it remains of direct personal relevance to each one of us. Roughly 90% of foetuses diagnosed with Down’s Syndrome are aborted. How does awareness of that statistic make adults with Down’s Syndrome feel? The message that is being sent to them is that their lives are deemed unworthy of living, that they are inferior beings. Furthermore, the unspoken assumption made by many is that this doesn’t matter, as people with Down’s must be incapable of experiencing complex emotions anyway. It is no use mumbling about ‘difficult personal decisions’ in circumstances like these. That is a travesty of an answer, because the real questions still remain: what is so bad about having Down’s Syndrome? And, more pertinently, what effect does the very existence of selective abortion have on the lives of those with Down’s Syndrome and other disabilities?

I know that a prenatal test for one of my conditions is expected within the next 10 years. It is already within the development stage…I would like to believe that the test will be used in a positive way, perhaps allowing parents to read extensively about their future child’s condition before the birth, make the necessary adaptations to their home and organise the best educational provision that they can well in advance. Call me a cynic, but somehow I doubt that this is what the test is intended for. And that makes me wonder whether all this talk of equality actually has any meaning, or whether it is simply designed to make non-disabled people feel good about themselves. How can you tell me that you value my contribution in the workplace when you support legislation that is grounded in the idea that disabled people are incapable of contributing anything? How can you laugh and joke around with me over lunch when you support a measure that is designed to protect disabled people from the vale of tears that we are supposedly doomed to inhabit?

You must, must, must read the whole thing: Choice and Disability (h/t Sisters of the Gospel of Life).

Here in America we’ve made great strides in helping people with disabilities to become more active and involved in our communities and work-forces, but it seems we have not yet relieved the general assumption that life with a disability or a sick loved one is unbearable or less fulfilling. We not only accept the murder of unborn children diagnosed with fetal abnormalities, but we advocate for sick and disabled people to have access to assisted suicide services and allow, even encourage, family members to starve their severely handicapped loved ones. But what do you expect when 52% of the people in our country admit that that they would rather be dead than disabled?

Previous post:
Better off Dead?

“They Don’t Know What Else is Out There”

ChelseaAdult Stem Cell Research, videoLeave a Comment

Video of Kadi DeHaan from Michigan who was paralyzed in a car accident four years ago and has benefited from treatments using stem cells derived from her own bone marrow:

She really nails it here when she says that when you mention stem cells many people assume you’re talking about embryonic and “don’t know what else is out there.” Either they are totally unaware of any alternatives or they think that ESCs are the only ones capable of treating patients. For example, a survey last year found that more people think that embryonic, rather than adult, stem cells have resulted in cures and treatments. The reality, of course, is that ACSs have had tremendous success in human patients with various diseases and disabilities whereas ESCs have successfully treated nothing significantly – in mice, let alone humans! And yet the ESCR hype remains. Some now even go so far as to guarantee the disease fighting power of therapeutic cloning. It should be quite obvious by now that results don’t really matter so long as it looks like something is being done to maybe, someday, possibly eradicate disease and suffering. Unfortunately in this case that something involves the intentional use and murder of tiny human beings.

Another video about Kadi:

Excellent: Jeff Fortenberry Addresses Clinton

ChelseaAbortion, Love, Politics, video, Women4 Comments

Video of Rep. Jeff Fortenberry (NE) addressing SOS Clinton and following up on Rep. Chris Smith’s comments about her love for the racist eugenicist Margaret Sanger (h/t Catholic Fire):

He even mentions the “genius of woman” I love that! Yes, women deserve better than abortion. The “genius” of woman is her ability to give love freely – in other words, to be maternal. As Gertrude von le Fort writes in her book The Eternal Woman: “To be a mother, to feel maternally, means to turn especially to the helpless, to incline lovingly and helpfully to every small and weak thing upon the earth.” This is God’s greatest gift to women. Abortion, as Mother Teresa told the nation 15 years ago, teaches a woman not to love, but to kill even her own child to solve her problems.

Clinton actually addressed the Sanger comments in this one – compared her to Thomas Jefferson and his support for slavery.

Related:
Calling all Geniuses

Chris Smith Calls Out SOS Clinton

ChelseaAbortion, Eugenics, Politics, videoLeave a Comment

We need more pro-life leaders in Congress like Rep. Smith. Here he calls out Sec. of State Hillary Clinton for her praise of the racist eugenicist Margaret Sanger. He also asks her if to clarify whether or not the United States’ definition of “reproductive health” and “reproductive services” includes abortions (h/t Jill Stanek – via twitter):

In her response Clinton completely ignored the claims about Sanger and instead just repeated the abortion party-line about the need for safe and legal abortions and the desire to reduce abortions through family planning and “reproductive health” services.

Come, Follow Me!

ChelseaPersonal, Pro LifeLeave a Comment

TwitterYes, I gave in – I finally joined the “Twitterverse” as my dad calls it. if you are also a part of the twitter community please come follow me: http://www.twitter.com/czParalytic

Other pro-life tweeters:
Jill Stanek
Monica Rafie – my Adult Stem Cell Awareness counterpart (I shamefully haven’t posted on there in ages! And there’s LOTS of good ASC news to report, too!!!)
Christopher West
Suzanne Fortin – from the Big Blue Wave

Pro-life orgs tweeting:
American Life League
National Right to Life
Students for Life of America
Operation Rescue
Americans United for Life
Susan B Anthony List
LifeSiteNews.Com

TOB Tuesday: What is Marriage?

ChelseaLove, Marriage, Religion, Sexuality, Theology of the Body, TOB Tuesday, videoLeave a Comment

A few years ago Pope Benedict said:

There are some who believe that it is legitimate to destroy human life in its earliest or final stages. Equally troubling is the growing crisis of the family, which is the fundamental nucleus of society based on the indissoluble bond of marriage between a man and a woman. Experience has shown that when the truth about man is subverted or the foundation of the family undermined, peace itself is threatened and the rule of law is compromised, leading inevitably to forms of injustice and violence. (Sept. 21, 2007)

Clearly the Church takes the sacrament of marriage seriously. But what is marriage and why do Catholics believe that it only meant to be between a man and a woman? In light of the recent controversy over Miss California’s defense of traditional marriage during Sunday’s Miss USA pageant, I thought it would be good to offer an explanation of the meaning of marriage for Catholics.

The Vatican II and the Code of Canon Law (Can. 1055) describe marriage roughly in this way: Marriage is the intimate, exclusive, indissoluble communion of life and love entered by man and woman at the design of the Creator for the purpose of their own good and the procreation and education of children; this covenant between baptized persons has been raised by Christ the Lord to the dignity of a sacrament.

OK…but what does that actually mean??

Christopher West does the best job of concisely explaining this in a few columns titled What is Marriage? – Part I and Part II. He also has another article explaining the Basic Theology of Marriage

There is not much that I can add to these articles or explain more concisely other than to say that, on a practical, natural level, the Church does not recognize or encourage same-sex marriage because of her belief that marriage is meant to be a symbol of the relationship of the Trinity and of Christ and the Church and that, based on the biological make-up of the human body as male and female, only the complementary union of two different sexes is capable of adequately symbolizing this life-giving love. I hope you will take the time to read those, very short, easy to understand, articles to at least gain a better understanding as to what Catholics really believe about the sacrament of marriage. The majority of those who ridicule and reject this teaching have no idea what it actually is. Unfortunately even many (probably most) Catholics do not fully understand it and, therefore, have a real hard time trying to defending it. Either that or, because this is such a contested issue, they avoid defending the sanctity of marriage altogether out of fear that they might be accused of “imposing their beliefs” on others. The late Fr. Richard Neuhaus responds to this:

Other important articles you should check out:
Created Male and Female for a Reason
Do Homosexuals Actually Exist?

It must be said that although the Church does not recognize the legitimacy of so-called homosexual “marriage” and denounces homosexual sexual relations as immoral, she does have great love and compassion for those with same-sex attraction and reaches out to our brothers and sisters and assists them in living chaste lives in fellowship, truth and love. See the Courage Apostolate

Previous posts:
“Fireproof”, Marriage and World Peace
Vocation to Marriage
TOB Tuesdays

Visit: http://tob4u.wordpress.com/

An Intrusion into Spiritual Time

ChelseaAssisted Suicide, Right to Life, video2 Comments

A few weeks ago I pointed out a comment I received on here defending assisted suicide for the terminally ill on the grounds that “it is how we live that matters, not how we die.” For the most part people want to be remembered (and want to remember others) for the way they “lived” their lives. We want to remember only the happy times, when we and our loved ones were well and enjoying all that “life” had to offer. Since sickness and death are opposed to this very ideal and since death is inevitable for all of us, we should at least have the option of going through it without having to endure a long period of pain and suffering, right?

Of course life is meant to be enjoyed and we should do what we can (within reason) to try to ease human suffering. However, and it’s so cliche to say this, life is a journey with many different experiences – good and bad, happy and sad – and each of these experiences and how we deal with them helps to shape our character and prepare us for what we might face in the future. The experience of death is no different. In his book Ethics and Human Life, Dr. Joseph M. Mauceri explains, through his own 30 year experience with dying patients, how in many ways death, when left to its natural course, is often a healing process (both for the patients and their loved ones) that prepares the individual to depart from this life:

The final point regarding euthanasia is that it is an immoral intrusion into spiritual time. Many dying patients have a profound experience of God, peace and reconciliation hours, days or even weeks before they die. These experiences are neither drug induced nor psychotic fugue states. They are moments of intense awareness; in fact, their very intensity often interrupts otherwise confused or lethargic states. Unlike the well popularized “near death” experiences of those who did not leave us, these patients leave with deep peace, and they bequeath a great consolation to their loved ones. In every case with which I am familiar, euthanasia would have prevented the experience by premature killing of the patient. If, you might say, that is of no consequence since they are dead in any case, the loss of these consolations would be a grievous loss for those of us who wait!…

My experience with many of the dying over nearly 30 years has left two powerful impressions. The first is that most people die in peace. They have passed through suffering, fear and doubt, but peace finally comes at the end. The other impression is that many whose faith was lost “come back,” as it were. I can only believe this to be the generous gift of faith and reconciliation that God wishes to give each one of us at the hour of our death. Illness, especially terminal illness, is always the occasion for a new journey and a new spirit. Some time may pass in anger and confusion about its meaning, but gradually lives begin to change. It is, as many have said, an opportunity given through suffering and grief to begin one’s own ascent to God.

We must not yield to the popular sentiments here regarding death. We must move toward death with the same confidence and faith in God’s love as we should the struggle and demands in our daily lives. We cannot really plan our deaths, despite all of the legal and ethical directives we might have in place anymore than we could live our lives without the unexpected crashing down on us. Life is what happens while we are making other plans, and death itself is always the unknown final drama. This is the reason why euthanasia is a lie. While it places us “psychologically” in control, it also requires of us what control always presupposes, a decision. If we have learned anything in our lifetime about us, about God, it is that we are not in control, and the wise decision is to repose in God’s care. I, for one, hardly think that the time near death is the time to lapse. (pp. 70 & 80)

God is always generous with the time He gives us. Because death is frequently met with much fear and anxiety, God gives us the experience of the dying process as preparation for this fantastic event. A time to be purified through suffering and practice total trust in His justice, mercy and love. Of course not all deaths occur in this way. In our fallen world accidents happen and people die instantly, but that doesn’t mean that we have the right to prematurely shorten someone else’s life, or our own. Like abortion, euthanasia/assisted suicide is an arrogant intrusion into the natural order of human life.

“If They Persecuted Me, They Will Also Persecute You”

ChelseaAbortion, Activism, video5 Comments

This is a very disturbing video, but a sobering reminder of what pro-lifers can and often will face as we stand up for the truth (H/T)

(warning: very filthy language, use of the “N” word)

The man being attacked in this video has filed a hate crimes lawsuit against his attacker. Bigotry against Christians and Christianity in general seems to be pretty well tolerated here in the United States, we’ll see how much luck they have with this lawsuit.

In fact, all who want to live religiously in Christ Jesus will be persecuted. (2 Timothy 3:12)

Pray for the perseverance of Christians and the pro-life movement.

Online TOB Class Tonight!

ChelseaTheology of the BodyLeave a Comment

nullAccording to Inflated Tires a special Theology of the Body class on Humanae Vitae with Father Thomas Loya will be live-streamed online tonight (April 15) at 7:30 p.m. eastern time.

Fr. Loya is a regular columnist for the Theology of the Body Channel at Catholic Exchange. He also has his own show for Catholic Radio Network called A Body of Truth.

Do tune in this evening if you’re at all interested in TOB. Fr. Loya has a wonderful insight into our late Holy Father’s teaching! Tune in: http://www.ustream.tv/channel/theology-of-the-body